The Godfather - Mario Puzo
I mostly had that same feeling all through reading it. I think Puzo is a super talented writer and has a bunch of timeless lines here. As Tim mentioned, the movie is a super faithful adaptation and most of the best lines there were here first. The story is of course super compelling and then there are those great literary elements, the classic tale of the fall of man. I mean yeah, it's well-written, it's got plenty of sex and violence, has some literary strength and an examination of the human condition. This is the quintessential boy book!
I think the boy book qualities are also it's greatest weakness and what turned me off from it often. It's always hard to know in these types of books, where all the characters are deeply flawed, if their deplorable acts are character revelations or kinda just the innermost thoughts of the author. Tons of super gross, weird, unnecessary chapters, often from the POV of women where I couldn't help but just think, ya know, I don't think women are like this. I hate to do this paragraph for every older novel I read that's written by a man, but this one was one of the most prime examples of this. There is a long chapter near the end of the book about very, very minor characters and their sex life and a weird pelvic surgery. I don't think this is just me being prudish but I was genuinely confused as to why I was reading about them at this point in the book. It was just so weird and uncomfortable and baffling as these characters are never seen again.
I think that aside from that chapter, I could have mostly forgiven the rest. I enjoy an examination of dangerous, hyper masculinity, even when it often glorifies it because I too can appreciate the allure of this storytelling while recognizing the acts as toxic. I also don't want to evaluate every book by my agreement with an author's ethics, but I do believe there has to be some common understanding. I think this book mostly did that, but that chapter I mentioned kinda threw everything into question and made me rethink my relationship to the book. I think it's an awesome book for 95% of it, but that other 5% looms large.
I'm not sure I'd actually totally recommend this book simply because I think the movie is so much better. It cuts the silly stuff and then adds all that style. I also had the distinct feeling that the movie told the story better, a rarity in my opinion, focusing more on Michael and his ascent. It's obviously a good book, and fills in a ton of context and detail, and of course perfect for fans of the movie who want more, but it was not perfect for me.
Comments
Post a Comment